DAO GOVERNANCE – Beautiful Exchange DAO

  • DAO GOVERNANCE – Beautiful Exchange DAO

    Posted by Jordan on June 3, 2025 at 12:45 am

    1. Who has a voice – and how is that expressed?
    Our governance model includes a hybrid participation system combining:

    • Base voice (1 vote) for all verified members

    • Additional influence through:

    • Circle participation (0.5x multiplier for active circle contributors)

    • Tenure (0.25x multiplier per quarter of active contribution, capped at 2x)

    • Specialized expertise (1.5x multiplier for protocol-specific decisions)

    • Stewardship Council holds final arbitration rights for vision alignment decisions

    2. Decision types and ownership

    *SEE ATTACHED PHOTO!

    3. Decision-making methods
    We will use:

    • Consent-based governance for operational decisions (pass unless reasoned objection)

    • Quadratic voting for resource allocation using SEEDS reputation tokens

    • Advice process for role-related decisions (mandatory consultation with affected circles)

    • Unity voting (80% threshold) for principle changes and protocol updates

    4. “Safe to try” boundaries
    Safe to try without approval:

    • Prototype testing within dedicated circles

    • Temporary working groups (<3 months)

    • Educational content creation

    • Localized community initiatives (<$500 equivalent)

    Requires broader agreement:

    • Protocol architecture changes

    • Mission/brand modifications

    • Partnerships over $10k equivalent

    • Circle dissolution/mergers

    5. Governance evolution
    Our governance will evolve through:

    • [X] Bi-weekly pulse checks with circle coordinators

    • [X] Quarterly regeneration retrospectives

    • [X] Annual governance hackathons

    • [ ] Other: Fractal feedback loops from sub-DAOs

    We’ll know it’s time to shift when:

    • 3+ circles report decision-making bottlenecks

    • New member onboarding exceeds 100/month

    • Cross-protocol transactions reach 10k/week

    • Community satisfaction scores drop below 4/5 for two consecutive quarters

    Jordan replied 3 weeks, 1 day ago 1 Member · 0 Replies
  • 0 Replies

Sorry, there were no replies found.

Log in to reply.