DAO GOVERNANCE – Beautiful Exchange DAO
-
DAO GOVERNANCE – Beautiful Exchange DAO
1. Who has a voice – and how is that expressed?
Our governance model includes a hybrid participation system combining:-
Base voice (1 vote) for all verified members
-
Additional influence through:
-
Circle participation (0.5x multiplier for active circle contributors)
-
Tenure (0.25x multiplier per quarter of active contribution, capped at 2x)
-
Specialized expertise (1.5x multiplier for protocol-specific decisions)
-
Stewardship Council holds final arbitration rights for vision alignment decisions
2. Decision types and ownership
*SEE ATTACHED PHOTO!
3. Decision-making methods
We will use:-
Consent-based governance for operational decisions (pass unless reasoned objection)
-
Quadratic voting for resource allocation using SEEDS reputation tokens
-
Advice process for role-related decisions (mandatory consultation with affected circles)
-
Unity voting (80% threshold) for principle changes and protocol updates
4. “Safe to try” boundaries
✅ Safe to try without approval:-
Prototype testing within dedicated circles
-
Temporary working groups (<3 months)
-
Educational content creation
-
Localized community initiatives (<$500 equivalent)
❌ Requires broader agreement:
-
Protocol architecture changes
-
Mission/brand modifications
-
Partnerships over $10k equivalent
-
Circle dissolution/mergers
5. Governance evolution
Our governance will evolve through:-
[X] Bi-weekly pulse checks with circle coordinators
-
[X] Quarterly regeneration retrospectives
-
[X] Annual governance hackathons
-
[ ] Other: Fractal feedback loops from sub-DAOs
We’ll know it’s time to shift when:
-
3+ circles report decision-making bottlenecks
-
New member onboarding exceeds 100/month
-
Cross-protocol transactions reach 10k/week
-
Community satisfaction scores drop below 4/5 for two consecutive quarters
-
Sorry, there were no replies found.
Log in to reply.